I take it you didn't have to support Windows NT servers with a max of 4GB FAT partitions. For now I can just fire off a single batch script to uninstall it from every one of our managed devices. We'll obviously be looking into a new way of automating the disk cleanup, so thanks for the link in any case. You mean I could have spent the time re-inventing the wheel (identifying places where temp files build up that are missed by built-in disk cleanup utilities IIS log files was just one example), whereas CCleaner had already done most of the hard work and I just had to automate a simple single batch script and drop it into my RMM?īy the way, we never let it update (the newer versions were getting pretty bloaty), which is why thankfully none of our customer's systems had the infected version installed. doesn't sound like it was a clear winner over CCleaner. Thanks for the link though, interestingly among MS's recommendation includes installing another 3rd party "IIS Log Cleaner" tool, the link for which is now broken. We did, using CCleaner as part of the automation. Thankfully that's (mostly) a thing of the past. There's been endless examples of applications or OS's that had strict limits on the layout/file systems of your disk volumes in the intervening years. I take it you never had to support Windows NT servers with a max of 4GB FAT partitions. ![]() Nowadays we go with one big C: volume as that's usually not a problem. ![]() You should do a cost benefit analysis of that whole situation ĬCleaner causing damage and the lost productivity/staffing hours to repair/rebuild itĪgainst the cost to just increase the server's storage. You could have spent the same effort automating the actual cleanup in particular as then you'll have complete oversight into what it is doing (especially if you ever let CCleaner update, the rules could change). I even had it automated from our RMM (low disk space warning? run ccleaner via batch file with arguments to perform cleanup using the same selections as last time). They're just creating pain points for themselves for no reason. Making C microscopic, and a large other partition for the webapp/database. These types of issues seem to be common with people who foolishly partition their servers for no good reason. It has the additional cost saving of removing or at least extending this whole maintenance cycle. You should do a cost benefit analysis of that whole situation CCleaner causing damage and the lost productivity/staffing hours to repair/rebuild it, against the cost to just increase the server's storage. There's more on the About page, and on the Jeff Rivett Consulting site.But I primarily used it on servers that were running low on disk space Jeff went on to work as a programmer, sysadmin, and manager in various industries. Proceeds from writing, software sales, and contract programming gigs paid his way through university, earning him a Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) degree at UWO. Jeff's writing appeared in Computist Magazine in the 1980s, and he created and sold a game utility (Ultimaker 2, reviewed in the December 1983 Washington Apple Pi Journal) to international markets during the same period. His first computer was an Apple II+, built by his father and heavily customized. Jeff Rivett has worked with and written about computers since the early 1980s. Apparently the malware in the compromised version of CCleaner contained a second payload that was only installed on about twenty computers at eight tech companies. Ongoing analysis of the hack revealed that this may have been a state-sponsored attack, and that it specifically targeted high profile technology companies. Update 2017Sep23: The server that was breached is actually managed by Avast, which purchased CCleaner software developer Piriform in July. If you have CCleaner installed on any Windows computers, you should make sure you’re running version 5.34, and if not, install it as soon as possible. Piriform reacted quickly to the discovery, and yesterday released a new version: CCleaner 5.34. The malware was found only in the 32-bit version of CCleaner. A recent version of the popular Windows cleanup tool CCleaner contains malware, apparently added by malicious persons who gained access to a server used by the software developer, Piriform.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |